Logo

Cart

Tag: ancient Indian medicine

Why Ayurveda Considers Mental Health Part of Physical Health: Understanding the Mind-Body Connection

Have you ever noticed how your body reacts when you’re going through a particularly stressful period?   You might find yourself sleeping poorly, losing your appetite, experiencing headaches or feeling unusually tired. Sometimes, even a perfectly normal day can feel physically exhausting when your mind isn’t in the right place.   And it works the other way around too.   When you’re unwell, physically exhausted or dealing with persistent discomfort, your mood and ability to think clearly can take a hit.   We often talk about physical health and mental health as though they are two completely separate things. We have one set of habits for keeping our bodies healthy and another for taking care of our minds.   But Ayurveda approaches this relationship quite differently.   In fact, the Ayurvedic texts consider the body and mind so closely connected that understanding one without considering the other gives us only part of the picture.   Let’s understand how.   Does Ayurveda consider the mind and body separate?   In Charaka Samhita, Acharya Charaka explains that life is not simply the existence of a physical body.   It is a combination of four essential components:   Sharira, Indriya, Sattva and Atma.   These refer to the body, sense organs, mind and soul.   This is an important distinction because the mind isn’t treated as something separate from the functioning of the human being. It is one of the fundamental components that make up our existence.   Charaka also explains that the body and mind are both important sites of health and disease.   In other words, physical disturbances can affect the mind, and disturbances of the mind can influence the body.   Think about it.   A person experiencing prolonged emotional distress may notice changes in their appetite, sleep, energy levels and physical comfort. Similarly, someone dealing with a long-term physical illness may experience anxiety, frustration, sadness or emotional exhaustion.   This relationship between the two is something Ayurveda recognised as an important part of understanding health.   The two types of Doshas   Now, this is where the Ayurvedic explanation becomes particularly interesting.   Most people are familiar with the three Doshas: Vata, Pitta and Kapha.   These are known as the Sharirika Doshas, or the bodily Doshas, and are associated with the regulation of different physiological functions.   But Ayurveda also describes another set of factors that influence the mind.   These are called the Manasika Doshas, namely Rajas and Tamas.   Unlike Vata, Pitta and Kapha, which are associated with the physical body, Rajas and Tamas are considered the factors responsible for disturbances in the mind.   Let’s understand what they mean.   Rajas: The quality of activity and movement   Rajas is associated with activity, stimulation, movement and passion.   It is what drives the mind towards action, desires, ambitions and attachments.   In its balanced expression, activity and motivation are necessary for everyday functioning. We need to be interested in things, pursue our goals and engage with the world around us.   But when Rajas becomes excessive, the mind may become restless, agitated and constantly occupied.   Think about those days when your mind simply refuses to slow down.   You keep thinking about unfinished work, worrying about things that haven’t happened yet, jumping from one thought to another and finding it difficult to sit quietly.   You might be physically exhausted, but mentally, you feel as though you haven’t stopped moving.   This is the kind of excessive activity associated with Rajas.   Tamas: The quality of inertia and heaviness   Tamas is associated with heaviness, inertia, darkness and inactivity.   It is important to understand that Tamas isn’t inherently bad. A certain degree of rest, stability and inactivity is necessary for life.   However, when Tamas becomes dominant, it can interfere with the normal functioning of the mind.   Think about the feeling of being mentally stuck.   You know there are things you need to do, but you cannot seem to gather the motivation to begin. You feel unusually dull, disconnected or uninterested in things that would normally engage you.   This excessive inertia is associated with Tamas.   And what about Sattva?   While Rajas and Tamas are considered the Manasika Doshas, Ayurveda describes Sattva as the quality associated with clarity, balance and knowledge.   A mind in which Sattva is predominant is described as being more stable, clear and capable of understanding things without being excessively influenced by agitation or inertia.   This is why Sattva is considered particularly important in the Ayurvedic understanding of mental well-being.   The idea isn’t to eliminate activity or rest from our lives. Both are necessary. It is about maintaining a state in which neither excessive agitation nor excessive inertia takes over the mind.   Can the mind influence the physical body?   Absolutely.   Charaka explains that the body follows the mind, and the mind follows the body.   Think about what happens when you’re constantly worried about something.   You might find yourself sleeping less, eating irregularly or experiencing changes in your daily routine. Over time, these changes can affect your physical well-being too.   Similarly, prolonged emotional distress can influence how we experience physical discomfort and how well we cope with illness.   The reverse is equally important.   Someone dealing with chronic pain, persistent digestive problems or a long-term illness may find that their mental well-being is affected by the physical condition.   This is why treating the body without considering the person’s mental state, or discussing mental well-being without considering physical health, can leave important aspects of the person’s experience unaddressed.   So, how does Ayurveda approach mental well-being?   The classical texts discuss several approaches to maintaining and supporting mental health.   One particularly interesting concept is Satvavajaya Chikitsa.   It is described as one of the approaches to treatment in Ayurveda and involves regulating the mind by helping a person withdraw from or redirect their attention away… Continue reading Why Ayurveda Considers Mental Health Part of Physical Health: Understanding the Mind-Body Connection

Understanding Ayurveda: A Way of Looking at Health

One of the things I find interesting about Ayurveda is that it doesn’t begin and end with the question of what is wrong with the body. It also asks what it means for the body to function well, what helps maintain that state, and how the way we live influences our health.   This might seem like an obvious distinction, but it changes the way we approach the subject. We are accustomed to thinking about health in terms of symptoms, diagnoses, and treatments. Ayurveda, while certainly concerned with the treatment of disease, also places considerable emphasis on preserving health before illness develops.   This is not a new idea in medicine, of course. But in Ayurveda, the maintenance of health is the very foundation of the system.   The word Ayurveda comes from two Sanskrit words Ayus, meaning life or lifespan, and Veda, meaning knowledge. It is translated as the science of life. What I find significant about this definition is its breadth. Ayurveda is not concerned exclusively with disease or the human body as an isolated biological structure. It considers the conditions that support a life of health and well-being.   To understand this approach, it helps to look at the principles on which Ayurveda is built.   According to Ayurveda, the human being was never understood as entirely separate from nature. The body is made up of the same fundamental elements that exist in the world around us. The food we eat, the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the environment we live in are not external to our experience of health.   They are constantly interacting with us.   And perhaps this is why Ayurveda places so much importance on paying attention to the world around us. Our bodies do not exist in a vacuum. They respond to changes in temperature, seasons, food habits, activity, rest, and countless other things that we may not always notice.   Of course, this doesn’t mean that every change in our health can be explained by our surroundings, or that we can resolve every problem by changing our lifestyle. But it does remind us that health is influenced by more than just the part of the body where a symptom appears.   Another thing I find interesting is that Ayurveda doesn’t assume the same approach will work for everyone. We often look for universal solutions. The same diet, the same routine, the same supplement, the same advice, hoping that what worked for someone else will work just as well for us.   Ayurveda encourages a more individualized way of looking at things. Two people might experience similar symptoms but have different underlying patterns, habits, and needs. Their constitutions, digestion, sleep, and responses to their environments may differ. So, while the symptom itself matters, understanding the person experiencing it matters too.   This is where the classical concepts of Dosha, Dhatu, Mala, and Agni come into the picture. These are not simply terms to memorise or labels to assign to ourselves. They belong to a larger framework through which Ayurveda understands the functioning of the body. Each concept describes a different aspect of that functioning, but none of them can be understood entirely in isolation.   And that, to me, is an important distinction. Learning a few Ayurvedic terms or identifying our Prakriti does not necessarily mean we understand Ayurveda. The concepts begin to make more sense when we understand how they relate to one another and how they fit into the broader principles of the system.   The same applies to the way Ayurveda understands food and medicine. We often reduce a substance to a single quality: this food is good for you, that herb is beneficial, or this ingredient is something you should avoid. But Ayurveda considers several aspects when understanding how a substance may act on the body.   Its taste, qualities, potency, and the changes it undergoes after digestion all contribute to that understanding. Some effects are also described as specific to a substance and not fully explained by those other properties alone.   This is why simply memorizing that a particular herb is used for a particular condition can give us an incomplete understanding. The more interesting question is why it is used, in what context, and for whom. Ayurveda offers a way to think through these questions rather than treating every ingredient as though it has the same effect on every person.   I also think it is worth paying attention to Ayurveda’s emphasis on prevention. A lot of our conversations around health begin only when something goes wrong. We look for a diagnosis, a treatment, or a way to get back to normal as quickly as possible. Ayurveda, however, also places importance on the ordinary things we do before illness develops: our daily habits, our relationship with food and rest, and the adjustments we make as our circumstances change.   There is something quite practical about this idea. We may not be able to control every aspect of our health, but we can become more attentive to our habits and to the ways our bodies respond to them. Rather than following a routine simply because it is popular, we can begin by asking whether it suits our circumstances and whether it is actually helping us.   At the same time, understanding Ayurveda does not mean accepting every traditional claim without question. Its concepts belong to a particular philosophical and medical tradition, and they should be understood in that context. Where claims concern the treatment or prevention of disease, they also need to be evaluated carefully against appropriate scientific evidence. Respecting a tradition and examining its claims critically are not mutually exclusive.   For me, the most useful way to approach Ayurveda is to look beyond the individual remedies, routines, and recommendations we encounter so often. Those things may introduce us to the subject, but they are only one part of it. The principles behind them are what help us understand how the… Continue reading Understanding Ayurveda: A Way of Looking at Health

Atman in Ayurveda: Understanding the Self, Mind, and Consciousness

Today, let’s talk about a concept in Ayurveda that is present in everything the system talks about, but not everyone gets into it or knows about it because the whole concept itself is too abstract on the surface.   I am talking about Atman, which translates to the self, the soul, or simply the knower.   Now, before jumping into what Atman really means, let’s start with something which we are more familiar with in terms of Ayurveda, which is the Manas, the mind.   So, mind is essentially the part of you that reacts. It takes in the stimulus and turns it into a response. It distinguishes between likes and dislikes. For example, if something you eat tastes good, you want to eat more of it, and if you experience pain, you pull away. You don’t want to experience it again.   This is what the Manas does.   However, Atman is something else entirely. It is a part of you that is aware that all of this is happening. It’s not the reaction itself, but it’s the one noticing the reaction.   While Manas distinguishes experiences into pain and pleasure, Atman is simply aware of the inside and outside, it is the very awareness of this experience.   Here’s a simple way of how I think about it.   When you’re feeling unwell, usually the food that you eat every time, or the food that you like, you don’t want to have it and it might even taste unpleasant to you.   But nothing about the food has changed. What changed is how it is being received by your body.   This shift, the change between you and your mind, is the job of Atman. It is adjusting your experiences based on what is happening inside you.   Now, Atman cannot itself be described the way we describe everything else in the body, because it has no color, no shape, no texture. Its presence is not known entirely or directly.   But even if you don’t see Atman, you infer it. How differently a person can respond to the same thing, and how something within them prompts them to respond in that particular way.   The whole Atman can also be understood through this perspective, from the whole idea of possession, how it naturally comes to us when we talk about our things.   When we say, “I am tired,” there is still this strange distinction between the one who is experiencing tiredness and the tiredness itself.   This distance implied between someone who possesses and something that is being possessed, is where the idea of Atman comes from.   All the parts of your body are what is possessed by you, the person. So, despite any changes or aging or anything, the one that is staying constant is me, my. The idea of the owner is what is Atma.   And this whole distinction isn’t just philosophical. There’s a real practical framework of diagnosis around it too.   In Ayurveda, illness comes in three severities. One is ordinary, one serious, and one that is heading to a very fatal outcome.   And the way you tell these apart isn’t just purely because of external signs, but how clearly the person can experience their own feeling.   How clearly can they experience things like their preference, discomfort, desire, how they feel, and if all of this is intact in a coherent way.   Because once illness starts to get serious, all of this starts to blur. The person struggles to clearly experience. Memory becomes hazy, and the coordination too falters.   And in most serious cases, the patients may not be able to experience anything at all. They might feel numb. They can’t tell you how they feel because the whole response, the whole connection between your Atma, Manas, and the senses has weakened and there’s only basic signs of life that’s left.   This is such a different way of thinking about diagnosis compared to how we actually imagine ancient medicine, which is reduced to something that is purely external, physical observation.   In Ayurveda, the presence of your mind and the clarity of your awareness itself is one of the most important ways to diagnose what is wrong inside you, and it is sometimes arguably more important than any physical sign.   Now, the takeaway from all of this is very simple, despite how abstract Atman sounds.   And before even Ayurveda gets into the details of the body, bones, tissues, or organs, it is first establishing that awareness that is present inside every one of us, and everything else is built on top of that basic confirmation.   Health is never only about visible, measurable parts of the body. It is always, at its core, something that is changing inside you.   And I think this is where Atman becomes much less abstract than it initially sounds.   Because when we hear words like soul or self, it can immediately feel like we’re entering a completely philosophical conversation, something very distant from the body and from medicine. But Ayurveda doesn’t really separate these things in the way that we might expect. The person who is experiencing the illness is not just the body that is carrying the illness.   There is the body, there are the senses, there is the mind, and there is this awareness that experiences all of it.   If ideas like this interest you, you can check out our courses on Charaka Samhita and Ashtanga Hridayam which talk in depth about how Ayurveda understands the self, the mind, and the body as one connected system and much more.

What Your Body Is Telling You Before You Ask It

There’s actually a lot we can tell about a person without asking them a single question.   If they are not feeling well, you can notice the way they look unusually pale, or that their voice sounds different, weaker than usual. Their eyes may look different, their skin may look dry, their lips may look chapped, or maybe they might just look exhausted.   These are just some observations.   Ayurveda actually has an entire section in the Charaka Samhita talking about this kind of observation called Indriya Sthana. The very first chapter is called Varṇasvarīyam Indriyam where Charaka describes how a physician should pay attention to changes in a person’s complexion, voice, and other signs when assessing an illness or the severity of a disease.   Because Ayurveda doesn’t look at the simple question of what disease this person is actually having. It instead goes a little deeper into asking what the body is telling us about the illness.   It is actually our body that gives out the first signs of illness before it becomes something more obvious. Disease isn’t always the beginning of the story. It is ultimately important to keep in check the signs that our body is giving away, always.   यच्चान्यदपि किंचिद्वर्णवैकृतमभूतपूर्वं सहसोत्पद्येतानिमित्तमेव हीयमानस्यातुरस्य शश्वत्, तदरिष्टमिति विद्यात्।   An abnormal change that was not present before, appears suddenly, and occurs in someone whose condition is already declining. Such a change, Charaka says, should be recognized as an ariṣṭa, an ominous prognostic sign.   Now, one of the most important ideas in the chapter is the distinction between Prakriti and Vikriti.   Prakriti refers to a person’s natural state, while Vikriti refers to the deviation from that state.   A person’s appearance may naturally vary depending upon their constitution, age, environment, and other individual characteristics. So we can’t just vaguely determine that one particular complexion may be healthy or unhealthy. We need to look a little deeper.   Charaka’s list of things to examine is very extensive. He not just mentions the complexion and voice, but also the smell, taste, touch, eyes, ears, nose, the mental state, and many more. The list goes on.   In fact, Charaka tells us that a person should be observed as a whole, because a single unusual sign doesn’t entirely tell the entire story.   A temporary change with an obvious explanation is different from a sudden change that appears without apparent reason in someone whose condition may already be deteriorating.   So generally, the whole idea is that observation becomes meaningful when it is placed in context.   The entire emphasis here is on the change that you witness within your body.   And I think this is where this idea becomes useful even outside the context of an Ayurvedic physician examining a patient.   Because most of us don’t necessarily pay attention to our own bodies or the signs they are giving out.   We know how we feel ultimately, whether our face is looking normal when we wake up, or if our skin is feeling as usual. We know our baseline.   But when you wake up feeling different we brush it off as, “Maybe I have not rested well.”   But you need to understand that the baseline is important.   Because if you suddenly feel unusually tired for several days, or maybe your appetite has changed, or there are other signs your body that are trying to tell you, then I think this is where we need to stop looking and start observing what is wrong.   Because from an Ayurvedic point of view, disease is never something that simply comes overnight. Long before it becomes serious, your body is already trying to protest against it through different signs.   None of those signs individually might feel like a big deal. And that is exactly why they get ignored.   But when you look at the whole picture, these small signs can slowly lead up to something more serious.   Disease isn’t the starting point, it is actually much closer to the end of the story that your body has already been trying to tell you for a while now.   We are often quick to notice when there is something wrong with our phones, our cars, or our laptops. We notice that the battery is draining faster than usual, or the screen is running slow, or the phone is lagging a bit.   But when it comes to our bodies, we often ignore the same signs.   And maybe it is because our lifestyle has changed. We sleep less, work more, eat at odd hours, and keep pushing ourselves through the day.   We think our body is adaptable, but it isn’t.   Your body is constantly giving you information. The question is whether you are paying enough attention to notice it.   You don’t have to become an expert at interpreting every single sign. You just need to know what your normal looks and feels like, so you can recognize when something starts to change.   If you want to understand your body a little more deeply, you can explore our courses on the Charaka Samhita and Ashtanga Hridayam, and learn how these texts approach the body, health, and the signs it gives us.