Logo

Cart

Tag: Ayurvedic practitioner

Satva, Rajas and Tamas: The Three Forces Behind How We Think and Act

When we look at something that already exists, we tend to focus on what we can see. To us, in our mind, a book is a book, a building is a building and a person is a person.   But let us go a little deeper, what made that thing come into existence in the first place? What happened before we could see the finished form? What allowed an idea to become reality?   According to the Ayurvedic understanding of nature, three fundamental qualities are involved in this process: Satva, Rajas and Tamas.   These are not substances in the ordinary physical sense. They are the principles that influence how things are conceived, developed, organised and eventually brought into a definite form.   They also influence how we think, respond to situations and behave.   From an idea to something real   Think about something as simple as a printed page.   Before the page existed, someone first had an idea. They imagined that information could be communicated through a page.   Then came the practical process where the paper had to be selected, its size had to be decided, the text had to be organized and the printing process had to be worked out.   Only then could the page actually be produced.   This can be understood through the three qualities.   Satva is associated with clarity, awareness and the emergence of an idea.   Rajas is associated with activity, movement and the effort required to bring that idea into action.   Tamas provides stability, limitation and resistance to further alternatives. It allows something to settle into a definite form.   All three have a role.   An idea without action remains an idea while an action without direction becomes scattered and without some form of limitation or stability, nothing is ever finalised.   This principle can be observed everywhere, from something as simple as making a page to something as complex as the development of a living being.   Satva, Rajas and Tamas in the mind   Ayurveda extends this idea beyond the physical world and applies it to Manas, or the mind.   Every person has Satva, Rajas and Tamas in relative dominance.   This explains us why two people can experience exactly the same situation but respond to it completely differently.   This is where understanding the predominance of Satva, Rajas and Tamas becomes important.   The Satva-dominant mind   A person in whom Satva is more prominent tends to be curious, observant and interested in understanding things.   They want to know why something happened.   If they fall ill, they may want to understand the cause, the relationship between their habits and their symptoms, and what they can do to improve their situation.   They may also be better able to remain composed during difficult circumstances. Instead of immediately reacting, they tend to step back, understand what is happening and work towards a solution.   This does not mean that a Satva-dominant person does not experience pain, fear or distress. Rather, their ability to understand and process the situation can influence how they respond to it.   The Rajas-dominant mind   Rajas is associated with movement, activity and constant engagement.   A Rajas-dominant person may be more expressive about both pleasure and discomfort. They may actively seek experiences, stimulation and reassurance.   If something happens to them, they may not necessarily be interested in understanding the deeper cause immediately. What they often need first is clear guidance and reassurance.   Once they feel confident about the course of action, they may be able to move forward.   Their mind is active and constantly responding to what is happening around them.   The Tamas-dominant mind   Tamas is associated with resistance, confusion and difficulty in moving forward.   A Tamas-dominant person may struggle to understand or accept what is happening around them. When they are facing a difficult situation, fear and apprehension may become stronger.   They may repeatedly question advice, seek opinions from several people and still find it difficult to make a decision.   Even with the outcome seeming clear, they may find it difficult to take a first step.   This is also why the same advice might not help every person, as they might not react to it in a similar way.   Why this matters in Ayurveda   For Ayurveda, treating a person is not limited to identifying physical symptoms.   The way a person perceives, expresses and responds to those symptoms also matters.   Let us take an example, someone may experience severe pain but barely express it while there is another person who may express relatively mild pain very dramatically. Someone else may not even understand that their symptoms require attention.   Now, the individual’s mental state might affect the way they communicate or show signs to understand about their condition.   If a practitioner judges the severity of a condition only by outward expression, there is a possibility of misunderstanding the situation.   Ayurveda’s understanding of Satva, Rajas and Tamas also highlights something that is often overlooked in modern conversations about health.   Two people can have similar physical circumstances but very different experiences of illness. Our perception, emotional response, understanding and behaviour can influence how we deal with what is happening to us.   This does not mean that mental qualities magically determine whether someone will recover. Nor does it mean that a person’s illness is simply a result of their mindset.   Rather, the Ayurvedic framework recognises that the mind is part of the individual’s overall experience and therefore deserves attention during care.   Three qualities, one constantly changing mind   Satva, Rajas and Tamas should not be understood as three permanent personality categories.   They are present in everyone, in different proportions, and can change depending on circumstances.   A person may be calm and thoughtful in one situation, highly restless in another and completely withdrawn in a third.   The important… Continue reading Satva, Rajas and Tamas: The Three Forces Behind How We Think and Act

Why Most Ayurvedic Doctors Never Practice Outside India, and Why That Needs to Change

Ayurveda has one of the largest trained healthcare workforces in the world. Yet very few Ayurvedic doctors ever practice outside India.   The problem isn’t a lack of talent. It’s a lack of global recognition.   When people talk about taking Ayurveda to a global audience, the conversation often revolves around awareness.   International interest has largely focused on wellness and herbal products.   But they overlook a much bigger challenge.   If qualified Ayurvedic doctors cannot easily practice outside India, how can Ayurveda truly become a global healthcare system?   The answer lies in something far less exciting than marketing.   It lies in regulation, recognition, and infrastructure.     India Has Thousands of Qualified Ayurvedic Doctors     India has built an impressive educational system for Ayurveda.   According to government data, the country has more than 379,000 registered Ayurveda practitioners and over 750,000 registered AYUSH professionals overall.   These aren’t hobbyists or wellness influencers.   Most Ayurveda physicians complete the Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery (BAMS), a government-regulated medical degree that takes five and a half years to complete.   Their education includes subjects such as anatomy, physiology, pathology, pharmacology, diagnostics, surgery, gynecology, ENT, ophthalmology, and clinical training, alongside classical Ayurvedic principles.   In other words, these are highly trained healthcare professionals.   Yet despite having such a large workforce, very few ever practice outside India.   Inside India, a BAMS degree is a recognized medical qualification regulated by the National Commission for Indian System of Medicine.   Outside India, the situation changes dramatically.   In many countries, the degree has little or no official recognition.   A BAMS-qualified physician moving to countries such as the United States cannot simply continue practicing as a doctor.   Instead, they often have to register through voluntary professional associations that do not grant medical licenses, prescribing rights, or hospital privileges.   This creates an unfortunate situation.   A physician who spent more than five years completing formal medical education may appear no different, from a legal standpoint, than someone who completed a short certification course in Ayurveda.   For patients, employers, and healthcare regulators overseas, distinguishing between the two becomes difficult.     Recognition Builds Trust     Healthcare systems rely on trust.   That trust comes from clear educational standards, licensing systems, and professional regulation.   When hospitals hire doctors or governments approve healthcare providers, they need reliable ways to verify qualifications.   This is where Ayurveda faces an important challenge.   There is currently no widely recognized international system that allows foreign regulators to quickly verify whether someone has completed an accredited BAMS program.   As a result, every country has to assess qualifications independently. Many simply choose not to create formal licensing pathways for Ayurvedic practitioners at all.   Without a straightforward verification process, expanding professional recognition becomes much more difficult.     Traditional Chinese Medicine Took a Different Approach     Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) offers an interesting comparison.   China invested heavily in creating international systems that support its practitioners. Government-backed TCM centers operate in numerous countries through official partnerships.   Training standards are clearly defined. Foreign governments have established mechanisms to recognize qualified practitioners.   This doesn’t necessarily mean TCM has better practitioners. It means the profession has stronger international infrastructure supporting those practitioners.   That infrastructure makes global mobility possible.     Why Credentials Matter     As Ayurveda grows in popularity around the world, more people are offering Ayurvedic consultations, wellness coaching, and lifestyle advice.   Some are formally trained physicians. Others have completed shorter courses or self-directed study.   For the average patient, it can be extremely difficult to tell the difference.   That creates confusion. It also affects the credibility of the profession as a whole.   When inaccurate information is shared publicly by someone presenting themselves as an Ayurveda expert, the reputation of qualified practitioners is often affected as well.   Without internationally recognized credentials, patients have no easy way to identify who has completed years of medical education and who has not.     Ayurveda Needs Better Global Infrastructure     The challenge isn’t producing skilled practitioners.   India has already done that. The challenge is building systems that allow those practitioners to be recognized internationally.   Several important steps could help move Ayurveda in that direction.   A globally accessible registry of accredited BAMS graduates would allow patients, hospitals, employers, and healthcare regulators to verify qualifications with confidence.   Mutual recognition agreements between governments could make it easier for qualified Ayurvedic physicians to practice in countries where there is growing demand.   Clear international credentialing standards would also help distinguish fully trained doctors from wellness practitioners with shorter certifications, creating greater transparency for patients.   India could continue working with international organizations such as the World Health Organization to develop consistent benchmarks for Ayurvedic education and professional practice.   Government-supported clinical partnerships overseas could further strengthen the profession by allowing experienced Ayurvedic physicians to work within recognized healthcare institutions abroad.   None of these ideas are unprecedented.   Many healthcare professions already use similar systems to support international mobility and recognition.     The Future of Ayurveda Depends on Its Practitioners     Ayurveda’s global future isn’t limited by a lack of knowledge or skilled professionals.   India already has hundreds of thousands of qualified Ayurvedic doctors who have undergone years of structured education and clinical training.   The real challenge is ensuring that the rest of the world can recognize those qualifications with confidence.   When patients can easily verify a practitioner’s credentials, when healthcare systems understand what a BAMS degree represents, and when governments create clear pathways for qualified physicians to practice internationally, Ayurveda will have a much stronger foundation for global growth.   The medicine has always been ready.   Now it’s time to build the systems that allow the people practicing it to be recognized around the world.